Lab /
Experiment
OneForma registration → dashboard access
Completed
Why
Decision
Complete access fail-fast through profile+preferences until tasks visible.
Why now
Next-round authority; parallel to Proof
Cost
| Time | Money | Attention |
|---|---|---|
| ~90 min incl. profile OTP/handoff | $0 | medium |
01What We Believed
Hypothesis
OneForma can answer the micro-pay access question — register/reach must be measured before published rates matter.
Prediction
{
"expected": "ACCESS_OK with tasks or ACCESS_BLOCKED before earning",
"confidence": 0.45
}Success criteria
labeled access outcome tasks or opportunities visible OR hard block recorded
Action
Signup → profile (TW address from resume) → preferences → dashboard.
02What Reality Said
Result
{
"status": "ACCESS_OK_TASKS_VISIBLE",
"summary": "Dashboard reached. ~13 recommended opportunities visible (e.g. Translation Raters $0.06/hit, Eris Annotation $5/hr). Active projects 0. No first paid task started.",
"block_point": "none"
}Economic outcome
none
Channel
03What Changed
Learning
Unlike Userfeel/Outlier, OneForma AccessProb cleared to task browse for TW after real profile. Next uncertainty is effective hourly after first paid hits — not access.
Reality
Believed OneForma might fail like sibling micro-pay. Reality: ACCESS_OK with recommended pool visible. Rule: after ACCESS_OK, next experiment must be timed earning sample — not more signup research.